1 Chronicles 22:7

(7) My son.—So some MSS., the Hebrew margin, and LXX., Vulg., Targ. rightly. The Hebrew text reads, “His son,” which is probably an oversight, due to “Solomon his son” in 1Ch_22:6.

As for me, it was in my mind.—Literally, I—it became with (near or in) my heart, i.e., it came into my mind, was my intention. The phrase is common in 2 Chronicles, but rare in the older books. (Comp. 1Ki_8:17; 1Ki_10:2; and also Jos_14:7.) It recurs in 1Ch_28:2 exactly as here.

Unto the name of the Lord.—Comp. 1Ki_8:29 : “My name shall be there,” i.e., My real presence. The statement of this and the following verses refers to what is told in 1Ch_17:1-14.

A Bible Commentary for English Readers, edited by Charles John Ellicott (1878–1897) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.

6–16. David’s Charge to Solomon

7. said to Solomon, My son] R.V. said to Solomon his son (so C’thîb); A.V. follows the K’rî.

unto the name] Cp. Deu_12:5; 2Sa_7:13.

The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges (gen. ed. J. J. S. Perowne; Cambridge University Press, 1878–1918) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.

And David said to Solomon,.... When brought into his presence:

my son, as for me, it was in my mind to build an house unto the name of the Lord my God; he was disposed and inclined to it, and was once determined upon it, see Sa2 7:2.

John Gill's Exposition of the Whole Bible (1746–1763) — public domain (CC PDM 1.0). Text via the HelloAO Bible API.

7. It was in my mind to build — See at 1 Chronicles Samuel 1Ch_7:1-17, and 1Ch_17:1-15.

Daniel D. Whedon (gen. ed.), Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1874–1909) — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.

Ver. 7. (Comp. 1Ch_17:1, 1Ch_17:2; 2Sa_7:2, 2Sa_7:3) For my son, the Chethiv shows "his son," the Keri substituting "my.

Vers. 7, 8.

The grounds of Divine refusals.

God would not permit David to build his temple, and he was graciously pleased to signify to him the grounds on which this refusal was made: "Because thou hast shed much blood upon the earth in my sight." For illustrations of the bloody character of David"s wars, see 2Sa_8:2, 5 10:18 12:31; 1Ki_11:16. David"s mission did not appear to consort with David"s wishes. He did not, however, see an unfitness which God recognized. A man must let God tell him what he may do and what he may not; and full willingness thus to receive Divine direction is a high sign of the true submission. No man ever finds it easy to give up his long-cherished wishes.

I A MAN MAY WILL MORE THAN HE MAY PERFORM. Distinguish carefully between willing, or seriously purposing, and mere wishing. A man"s sentimental wishes mean nothing, and cannot stand in place of right deeds; but a man"s definite plans and purposes may be as true expressions of character and righteousness as actual deeds could be; and so God may say, "Thou didst well that it was in thine heart." One of the gravest troubles to the earnest man is the impossibility of carrying into effect one-half of what he can purpose and desire to do. The artist has his visions of more and better pictures than he can ever paint. The author plans more and better books than he will ever write. The Christian resolves upon nobler works than he will ever accomplish, and a nobler life than he will ever live. From this common fact an important argument for man"s immortality may be drawn. There must be the larger sphere in which man may find the room which he vainly seeks here.

II A MAN"S PROVIDENTIAL PLACE MAY PUT HIM IN LIMITATIONS. David was where God had lint him, and in his wars he had been doing the work which God required him to do; and yet he found his very life-work limited him; and his very faithfulness to God hindered his accomplishment of his own cherished desires. So it often is still. A man"s providential place is one he never would have chosen. A man"s life-work is one that prevents his following out his own wishes. At this men often fret, fancying themselves fit for far higher work than is given to their charge. But the true-hearted man accepts the Divine overruling and the painful limitations, learning to say calmly, "My times are in thine hand," and thankful that in some sphere he may carry out the Divine purposes of grace.

III THE DIVINE REFUSAL OF A MAN"S PERSONAL WISH IS ALWAYS WISELY BASED. God sees influences and consequences which the man himself may fail to discern. God works ever for the larger good of the whole, and his sphere takes in wider considerations than any individual can reach. God"s estimate of what a man is, and is fit for, may well differ from a man"s own estimate of himself. And God"s sensitiveness to what is befitting we may be sure is keener and altogether more refined and subtle than any man"s. Enough that we are sure all God"s decisions are based on the judgments of infinite wisdom, and never on mere eccentricities of feeling.

IV YET THE PURPOSE WHICH A MAN MAY NOT EXECUTE MAY WIN THE DIVINE ACCEPTANCE. David"s intention was acknowledged graciously, and the next best thing was given him. His son should do what. he might not do; and that son should do it as soon as David had passed away. And even more than this: the preparation work David was himself permitted to arrange, and the plan he might devise; so that, after all, the temple that was ultimately built was more David"s than Solomon"s.

Plead that a man does well who has great things in his heart; but he must be sure that Divine providences and leadings and nothing else keep him for carrying them out and giving them practical effect. R.T.

The Pulpit Commentary (1880–1919), ed. H.D.M. Spence-Jones & Joseph S. Exell — public domain. Text from a community e-Sword module.

And David said to Solomon,.... When brought into his presence:

my son, as for me, it was in my mind to build an house unto the name of the Lord my God; he was disposed and inclined to it, and was once determined upon it, see Sa2 7:2.

Keil & Delitzsch — Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1861–1891) — public domain (CC PDM 1.0). Text via the HelloAO Bible API. (Old Testament only.)